From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: Really fix the BYT/HSW regressions Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:45:35 +0530 Message-ID: <1454908539-14137-1-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6C3260474 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:12:08 +0100 (CET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: patches.audio@intel.com, Pierre-Louis Bossart , liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, Vinod Koul , broonie@kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org So we had some issues due to common acpi matching code which caused regression on BYT first and fixes on that caused regression on HSW. So this series revert the old fix and properly fixes by making matching module as a separate ones and then adding BYT PCI ids conditionally. This was tested on BYT/CHT platforms, HSW/BDW and SKL so test coverge should ensure that this is really fixed this time. Thanks to Jie Yang and Pierre for testing and suggesting fixes Pierre-Louis Bossart (1): ASoC: Intel: Load the atom DPCM driver only Vinod Koul (3): ASoC: Intel: Revert "ASoC: Intel: fix ACPI probe regression with Atom DPCM driver" ASoC: Intel: Create independent acpi match module ASoC: Intel: Add module tags for common match module sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++-- sound/soc/intel/common/Makefile | 9 +++------ sound/soc/intel/common/sst-acpi.c | 4 ++++ sound/soc/intel/common/sst-match-acpi.c | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1