alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, vinod.koul@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ASoC: ACPI: add new fields for SOF support
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:35:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507912517.16112.463.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012234945.30318-4-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 18:49 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

> - * @fw_filename: firmware file name.
> + * @fw_filename: firmware file name. Used when SOF is not enabled.

> + * @sof_fw_filename: Sound Open Firmware file name, if enabled
> + * @sof_tplg_filename: Sound Open Firmware topology file name, if
> enabled

Naming looks a bit awkward to me, though I would like to bring something
else here, i.e. unifying those firmwares somehow here.

It might be dealt with using two different (embedded) structs, e.g.

enum fw_type fw_type;
union {
 struct regular_fw fw;
 struct sof_fw sof;
}

It looks for me slightly cleaner to this struct than bring everything
inside it.

What do you think?

> +	const char *sof_fw_filename;
> +	const char *sof_tplg_filename;
> +	const char *asoc_plat_name;
> +	struct platform_device * (*new_mach_data)(void *pdata);

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-13 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 23:49 [PATCH 0/8] ASoC: Prepare Sound Open Firmware (SOF) driver integration Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] ASoC: move ACPI common code out of Intel/sst tree Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 2/8] ASoC: Intel: common: use c99 syntax for ACPI/machine tables Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 3/8] ASoC: ACPI: add new fields for SOF support Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-13 16:35   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-10-13 17:17     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-21 10:30   ` Applied "ASoC: ACPI: add new fields for SOF support" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 4/8] ASoC: Intel: move all ACPI match tables to common module Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-13 16:38   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-13 17:21     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-21 10:29   ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: move all ACPI match tables to common module" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] ASoC: Intel: add SOF firmare/topology file information Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-21 10:29   ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: add SOF firmare/topology file information" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: Intel: move machine drivers to dedicated KConfig Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 7/8] ASoC: Intel: reorder boards Kconfig by chronological order Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 8/8] ASoC: Intel: clarify Kconfig dependencies Pierre-Louis Bossart
2017-10-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 0/8] ASoC: Prepare Sound Open Firmware (SOF) driver integration Liam Girdwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507912517.16112.463.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).