From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] ASoC: Intel: boards: align Kconfig configurations for HiFi2 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:08:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1511024900.25007.315.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20171118000202.22302-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20171118000202.22302-7-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEE9266EFA for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:08:24 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171118000202.22302-7-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Pierre-Louis Bossart , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: arnd@arndb.de, tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 18:02 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Make sure all the configs are aligned > Also add the missing dependencies on SOC_ACPI stuff used to fix > DAI names based on HID. > > FIXME: not sure why X86_INTEL_LPSS is needed in a machine > driver config, should it be back to X86 everywhere? > X86_INTEL_LPSS makes sense only for Haswell, Broadwell, BayTrail and CherryTrail (more precisely for PCH inside those SoCs). Basically it enables few peripheral drivers in case they are enumerated via ACPI (SPI, I2C, UART, PWM, SDHCI) on SoCs listed above. Hope this would help how to deal with the option in ASoC case. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy