alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>,
	Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.co.uk>,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98357a: Fix speaker pop when starting playback
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:01:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521723692.1890.1.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180322015456.GZ2186@sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,

Thanks for reviewing this so quickly.

On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 09:54 +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:30:15PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> 
> > +- sdmode-delay : specify a delay time for SD_MODE pin. According
> > +        to the DAC datasheet, if LRCLK is removed while BCLK is
> > present,
> > +        the DAC output can cause loud pop/crack noises. This
> > property
> > +        specifies a delay for the SD_MODE pin assert, required to
> > +        eliminate the noise.
> 
> Why is this configurable?  This sounds like something entirely within
> the digital domain of the device rather than something that depends
> on
> board configuration and it's hard to see how someone would configure
> this.
> 

The amount of delay needed seems specific to the CPU DAI,
not specific to the DAC. The CPU DAIs or the machine 
could specify this as a parameter, but I can't don't see how.

Perhaps it could be a driver parameter?

> > +static void max98357a_enable_sdmode_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +   struct max98357a_priv *max98357a = container_of(work,
> > +           struct max98357a_priv, enable_sdmode_work.work);
> > +   unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +   spin_lock_irqsave(&max98357a->sdmode_lock, flags);
> > +   gpiod_set_value(max98357a->sdmode, max98357a-
> > >sdmode_enabled);
> > +   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&max98357a->sdmode_lock, flags);
> > +}
> 
> What is this lock supposed to accomplish?  We perform a single action
> under the lock which itself has internal locking, it's not going to
> have
> any meaningful effect.

I am under the impression it removes the race condition
between the gpiod_set_value() happening in the different
contexts.

Thanks,
Eze

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21 22:30 [PATCH] ASoC: max98357a: Fix speaker pop when starting playback Ezequiel Garcia
2018-03-22  1:54 ` Mark Brown
2018-03-22  4:00   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-03-22 13:01   ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2018-03-27 11:36     ` Mark Brown
2018-03-27 18:11       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-03-27 21:57       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-04-16 18:06         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1521723692.1890.1.camel@collabora.com \
    --to=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=mac.chiang@intel.com \
    --cc=smbarber@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).