From: jassi brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Separate dma driver for cpu_dais
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:39:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b68c6791002161839q705df04cmeda046736948c614@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
The query concerns ASOC.
Currently we have one platform per card.
What if my card has two dai_links with each cpu_dai fed data
with different mechanism(one with system dma controller and
the other with a dma dedicated to the Audio block). The cpu_dai's
are tightly coupled and I don't wanna have separate socdev's for them.
Presently, I define a dma_id flag in snd_soc_dai, make the snd_soc_card
point to a 'wrapper/muxed' platform driver that checks the dma_id flag and
calls the relevant platform's callbacks. Of course, each cpu_dai initializes
the dma_id to a unique value that corresponds to it's real dma mechanism.
What approach/changes would you suggest I take, so that someday I could
submit the implementation for mainline inclusion?
(For those curious to have a reference - I am talking about Samsung's SoCs
<http://dev.odroid.com/wiki/odroid/pds/HardwareInformation/S5PC100_UM_REV101.pdf
refer to figures on page-1635 & 1637>
that have I2S controllers with h/w mixing capability and where
'secondary fifo' can be
fed with I2S internal DMA controller with dedicated h/w ring buffer)
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-17 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-17 2:39 jassi brar [this message]
2010-02-17 6:58 ` Separate dma driver for cpu_dais Joonyoung Shim
2010-02-17 7:24 ` jassi brar
2010-02-17 7:37 ` Joonyoung Shim
2010-02-17 10:52 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-17 12:15 ` jassi brar
2010-02-17 13:14 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-18 2:14 ` jassi brar
2010-02-18 9:35 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-18 9:42 ` jassi brar
2010-02-18 9:52 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-18 10:32 ` jassi brar
2010-02-18 10:57 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-18 11:59 ` jassi brar
2010-02-18 13:10 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-23 5:45 ` jassi brar
2010-02-23 10:37 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-19 9:48 ` jassi brar
2010-02-19 9:50 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-18 6:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
2010-02-18 9:42 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-17 10:42 ` Mark Brown
2010-02-17 12:13 ` jassi brar
2010-02-17 12:42 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b68c6791002161839q705df04cmeda046736948c614@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).