Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikhail Ramendik <mr@ramendik.ru>
To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Compiling the newest code for testing?
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:25:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501070525.45603.mr@ramendik.ru> (raw)

Hello,

I would like to do some extensive testing of alsa on my Intel 865PE hardware 
(notably the analog vs. SPDIF issues). I have done some bug reporting and 
tested some fixes (thanks go to Takashi) in the past, but then fell out of 
sync on kernel versions because of other kernel-related issues on my hardware 
(now finally resolved).

I would like to test the latest code, in order for this testing to be most 
useful.

But I really got lost in what is that newest code that I should test, and in 
how I should get it to run. So I have some questions:

- Which alsa code version is in the 2.6.10 kernel release? 
(include/sound/version.h says 1.0.6, but there seem to be changelog entries 
and factual changes even from 2.6.10-rc3...)

- Which alsa kernel code should I run for testing? The 2.6.10-kernel version? 
1.0.8rc2? CVS? 1.0.8rc2 plus some files from CVS [those related to i8x0]?

- Is it OK to compile this kernel code by merely copying the relevant 
directories (sound [except for sound/oss] and include/sound) from the alsa 
tree into the kernel tree? I run an RPM-based system, and would like to keep 
the existing approach to kernel building (full RPM rebuild) alive; it's slow 
but reliable. 

- Which alsa-lib and alsa-utils code should I be running? (I know how to 
compile it using RPM, I just need to understand the version).

And an i8x0-specific question: in the above-mentioned current code, should 
output to hw:0,0 go only to analog, or to both analog and spdif? 

-- 
Yours, Mikhail Ramendik



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt

             reply	other threads:[~2005-01-07  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-07  2:25 Mikhail Ramendik [this message]
2005-01-07 11:16 ` Compiling the newest code for testing? Takashi Iwai
2005-01-07 18:27   ` Mikhail Ramendik
2005-01-07 18:39     ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200501070525.45603.mr@ramendik.ru \
    --to=mr@ramendik.ru \
    --cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox