From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Re: [ALSA] snd-emu10k1: ALSA bug#1297: Fix a error recognising the SB Live Platinum. Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:54:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20051004005401.GC10697@redhat.com> References: <7a5967f2d895440aa1ca2fa1d201c380@pobox.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by alsa.jcu.cz (ALSA's E-mail Delivery System) with ESMTP id EEDA31B9 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 02:54:05 +0200 (MEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a5967f2d895440aa1ca2fa1d201c380@pobox.sk> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Peter Zubaj Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, James@superbug.co.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List , perex@suse.cz List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Peter Zubaj wrote: > AFAIK this was fixed in CVS. Two cards have same model id (one has AC97, one not). > > Fix: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8360485&forum_id=33141 > >>From the look of that patch, this will just print "emu10k1: AC97 is optional on this board Proceeding without ac97 mixers..." and do nothing about actually making things work for people again, or even to suggest what they can do to work around this situation when their volume control breaks. At the least this sounds like it needs to mention a module parameter to force ac97 support. What actually happens if we set ac97_chip=1 on the boards that don't have it ? Is it purely a cosmetic thing, showing some sliders that do nothing? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl