From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:25:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20060313092553.GF5780@elte.hu> References: <1141846564.5262.20.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <20060309084746.GB9408@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1141938488.22708.28.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <4410B2D7.4090806@yahoo.com.au> <1141958866.22708.69.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <441109BC.9070705@yahoo.com.au> <1142016627.6124.33.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <44121351.2050703@yahoo.com.au> <1142210977.7471.27.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1142210977.7471.27.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Cc: Nick Piggin , cc@ccrma.Stanford.EDU, Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Heiko Carstens , Steven Rostedt , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Well, I found it. Finally. I diffed memalloc.c in the alsa kernel tree > with alsa stable 1.0.10 and googled for the obvious two chunks that > stood out :-) > > It's apparently an old issue, see here and follow the thread: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/9 > So, 1.0.10 obviously did not include these two patches: ah, great detective work! FYI, current upstream has the fix included, so 2.6.16-rc6-rt2 should not have this particular problem. Ingo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642