From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Rigg Subject: Re: SALSA and aplay Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:40:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20070719154008.GA3238@localhost> References: <200707161340.23503.gineera@aspect135.co.uk> <200707181601.11164.gineera@aspect135.co.uk> <200707181720.29171.gineera@aspect135.co.uk> <20070719142440.GA2467@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail3.uklinux.net (mail3.uklinux.net [80.84.72.33]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC91110382A for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:36:54 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: ALSA devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 04:27:29PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:24:40 +0100, > John Rigg wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to specify hw:0 (or whatever card you are using) > > in this case? With this type of hardware I'd rather make sure that dmix > > isn't used at all (I assume that dmix is now the default instead of > > hw:0). > > Well, you can claim that because you don't get bug reports or rants ;) :-) I wasn't criticising the decision to make dmix the default, just suggesting that Alan and other users of pro and semi-pro hardware specify on the command line which device they want apps to use. > The only reason that plug+dmix is used is that it can handle most > cases without hitches. It works as it is. That's all above other > reasons. I understand entirely. John