From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@smile.org.ua>
Subject: uniwill (0x1558, 0x9075) dup
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:49 +0200
Message-ID: <20071218163749.GE29292@serv.smile.org.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from serv.smile.org.ua (serv.smile.org.ua [193.178.237.153])
	by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DF824507
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:37:51 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Hi!

I investigated the duplicate problem and try to compare two cases.
I don't deep to search of the specifications, but the current variant (with
asus-laptop) should be more correct. In last HG snapshot second case already
comented. I just noticed on my reseaches.


-- 
With best regards,
Andy Shevchenko.      mailto: andy@smile.org.ua