From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: ASoC for TI OMAP - alsa-devel submission? Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:00:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20080402110054.GA7977@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <20080402134530.3460b0bf.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FCA2442A for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080402134530.3460b0bf.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 01:45:30PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > So what I mean that should I post the patch like as it now, rebased to > dev branch of linux-2.6-asoc tree and with some minor changes, or wait a > bit when all linux-omap and ASoC v2 evolve? What you think? Whatever is most convenient for you. From the point of view of getting stuff in immediately it's best to base things on ASoC v1 though from an ongoing development point of view ASoC v2 is a better target if you can cope with any churn and hopefully we should be starting to push it into the kernel within the next couple of release cycles so if it's going to take a while to get the required BSP changes in...