From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: wrong print debugging message code Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20080623111228.GA9318@sirena.org.uk> References: <280b69ac0806202244s11e74363l4de3f020fed849be@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F19248A3 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:12:29 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jin-Young Park List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:55:57PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > The confusing thing is that it defines to '0' (and I'm not sure the > debug is activated as default in the current code -- Mark, Liam, is it > intentional?). I doubt it. > IMO, the debug should be basically off as default, and if enabled, it > should be defined to '1'. Really they should all just be deleted and replaced by the standard pr_() macros but if we wait for v2 then we'd be able to use the dev_() variants instead.