From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [0/2] Jack reporting Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:17:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20080720121745.GA27546@sirena.org.uk> References: <20080703095026.GA652@sirena.org.uk> <20080714151058.GF25448@sirena.org.uk> <20080716125053.GA17134@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20080716112939.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> <20080717103111.GB15333@sirena.org.uk> <20080720052320.GB7853@anvil.corenet.prv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080720052320.GB7853@anvil.corenet.prv> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:23:20AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > I added the switch definition to input.h and it shoudl hit the mainline > when I ask Linus to pull early next week. Excellent, thanks. Takashi, what's the best way to handle the ALSA bits? The first patch doesn't depend on the new switch type so could be applied as-is but the second (adding the microphone switch type) depends on the input switch type being added - should I resubmit that when the switch type has been merged?