From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Problem setting mixer switch with amixer/alsactl. Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:25:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20081024172533.GA3328@sirena.org.uk> References: <48FF7538.3090000@oliford.co.uk> <20081023132705.GA20557@sirena.org.uk> <4900829A.8000703@oliford.co.uk> <20081023140116.GB17901@sirena.org.uk> <87mygvmci7.fsf@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614C3245B6 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:26:02 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mygvmci7.fsf@free.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Robert Jarzmik Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Oliver Ford List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:45:20PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Mark Brown writes: > > This is normal - shouldn't be an issue except in UI terms, ALSA limits > > the length of names. > Mark, I don't think that's true. > I had that problem several monthes ago (remember my patch about alsa controls > length ?). > Do you remember that patch, which went into asoc-v2 ? : All this patch does is change the limit, there is still a limit on the length of control names in ALSA but as I say it's purely a cosmetic issue.