From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: TLV320AIC23B Support more sample rates Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:49:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20081106104905.GA26469@sirena.org.uk> References: <20081105185220.GA10816@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <1225911211-22474-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E4A244DE for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:49:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Troy Kisky List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:35:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > + return score; > > + return 0xffffffff; > -1 would be simpler and safer (for possible missing f's). I'm not sure that'd add to the clarity - the goal isn't to have all bits set, the goal is to have a much larger score than could ever otherwise be achieved so putting in a very large constant expresses that much more directly.