From: Simon Hengel <simon.hengel@wiktory.org>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: vi-like key bindings for alsamixer
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:50:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090402155034.GA5790@john> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D46195.5030609@ladisch.de>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:56:21AM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > Is this deemed suitable for the masses?
>
> _Undocumented_ commands certainly aren't. ;-)
This is certainly true.
While working on documentation I realized that '+' and KEY_UP, contrary
to what is documented, do different things.
'+' increases volume by 1% whereas KEY_UP increases volume by 2%.
So actually it is like:
W | + increase volume by 1%
w | KEY_UP increase volume by 2%
X | - decrease volume by 1%
x | KEY_DOWN decrease volume by 2%
Still this makes no difference with my hardware, as the granularity is >
3% (e.g. snd_mixer_selem_get_playback_volume_range gives {0, 31} or {0,
15} for {min, max}).
I wonder if it would be a good idea to unify it. Consequently one could
do the same for left & right levels.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-01 19:58 vi-like key bindings for alsamixer Simon Hengel
2009-04-01 19:58 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils] Added vi-like key bindings to alsamixer Simon Hengel
2009-04-02 6:56 ` vi-like key bindings for alsamixer Clemens Ladisch
2009-04-02 15:50 ` Simon Hengel [this message]
2009-04-02 16:05 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils 1/2] alsamixer - unified behavior of volume control keys Simon Hengel
2009-04-02 16:05 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils 2/2] alsamixer - unified behavior of volume keys for left & right levels Simon Hengel
2009-04-20 12:56 ` [PATCH - alsa-utils 1/2] alsamixer - unified behavior of volume control keys Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090402155034.GA5790@john \
--to=simon.hengel@wiktory.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox