From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC] SoC WM8940 Driver Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:25:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20090427122550.GF1760@sirena.org.uk> References: <49F21310.4060009@cam.ac.uk> <20090425102100.GA4394@sirena.org.uk> <49F345A8.1030901@cam.ac.uk> <20090425180346.GA4072@sirena.org.uk> <49F599BB.9050805@cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2718103819 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49F599BB.9050805@cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:40:43AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > As in snd_soc_dapm_add_route only mux, switch and mixer controls can take > a control element. You can modify the core, or if you're not keen on doing that just drop this feature for now - it's relatively rarely used. > Nearest I can currently come up with is to insert a mux with only one option... It'd need to be a mixer, at least. A mux with only one option could never be disabled.