From: Lennart Poettering <mznyfn@0pointer.de>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] control, hw, rawmidi: accept control device node as card identifier when opening
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:24:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090512132447.GF29607@tango.0pointer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0905121433510.25064@eeebox2.perex-int.cz>
On Tue, 12.05.09 14:42, Jaroslav Kysela (perex@perex.cz) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > With my original patch there are no superfluous opens.
>
> If application uses more *open() calls from alsa-lib for one card (for
> example to open ctl handle and pcm handle), it's better to obtain card
> index at first, because each conversion requires one or more (card id)
> open/close sequence for control device to get card_info. Providing direct
> card index eliminates this conversion. It's just suggested optimization.
I think if apps want to open ctl and hw at the same time the most
elegant way would be this:
<snip>
snd_pcm_open(&pcm, "hw:/dev/snd/by-path/yaddayadda", ...);
snd_pcm_info(pcm, &info);
snd_ctl_open(&ctl, snprint("hw:%i", snd_pcm_info_get_card(info)));
</snip>
With my patch that costs exactly two open() calls. It's also more
flexible since it will handle arbitrary device strings, doesn't need
to hardcode "hw:".
You seem to suggest this:
<snip>
i = snd_card_index("hw:/dev/snd/by-path/yaddayadda");
snd_hw_open(&hw, snprint("hw:%i", i));
snd_ctl_open(&ctl, snprint("hw:%i", i));
</snip>
Which your patch that costs three open()s. And hardcodes "hw".
I really would like to know why my patch was so bad?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 22:41 [PATCH] control, hw, rawmidi: accept control device node as card identifier when opening Lennart Poettering
2009-05-12 6:09 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2009-05-12 11:40 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2009-05-12 12:32 ` Lennart Poettering
2009-05-12 12:42 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2009-05-12 13:24 ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2009-05-12 14:40 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2009-05-12 16:04 ` Lennart Poettering
2009-05-12 16:54 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2009-05-12 12:29 ` Lennart Poettering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090512132447.GF29607@tango.0pointer.de \
--to=mznyfn@0pointer.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox