From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] ASoC: OMAP3: Report delay on playback caused by the internal FIFO Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:06:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20100302140631.GA2502@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1267537191-25254-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <1267537191-25254-5-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <20100302134707.GF10658@sirena.org.uk> <201003021552.36622.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C501103905 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:06:29 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201003021552.36622.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: "tiwai@suse.de" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:52:36PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2010 15:47:07 ext Mark Brown wrote: > > You're already handling the playback vs. capture thing here! :) > Oh yes, I do. I have removed the capture (rx related) reporting, since as I > mentioned, I was not sure how to, and what to report. > But is it OK to have initially support for playback delay handling, and if there > is a need, add the capture later? The code is fine, this was more a comment on the earlier patch.