From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: tlv320dac33 fixes Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20100311170738.a91bff10.jhnikula@gmail.com> References: <1268317582-10284-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <20100311164628.f6c08a0b.jhnikula@gmail.com> <201003111655.12504.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com (mail-ew0-f219.google.com [209.85.219.219]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA6E24366 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:06:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so55004ewy.22 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:06:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201003111655.12504.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:55:12 +0200 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > Just curious: what would happen if the BCLK is cut while the McBSP is > > operating? > > The symptom is that we can not access to McBSP register address space causing > kernel panic, which can only be fixed by rebooting the device. > The burst driven BCLK causes some internal state machine to stuck, leaving the > given McBSP port dead from the outside. Other ports operate after this event. > Obviously this only bites in McBSP slave mode, and with codec like DAC33 which > have burst mode, in other cases the BCLK is always running (or McBSP is master). > > > I'm thinking are there also other similar problems, e.g. if > > the rate is not correct. > > Hmmm, could be possible, but I did not experienced with such a problem. > Thanks for sharing this info. Sounds exactly similar problem what I encountered once with the OMAP2420 and EAC. I didn't debug that problem any further then but there also some register accesses (not all) caused kernel panic if the external clock was missing or if the rate wasn't correct. -- Jarkko