From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsi: FSI2 device support Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:19:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20100324111914.GB5831@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDBC1037F5 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:19:09 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Linux-ALSA List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:26:55PM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > These patches are FSI2 support > Kuninori Morimoto (4): > ASoC: fsi: ensures process inside master lock > ASoC: fsi: Add FIFO size calculate > ASoC: fsi: IRQ related process had be united > ASoC: fsi: Add FSI2 device support Applied patches 1 and 3, patch 4 was OK but won't apply without the FIFO size change (and presumably depends on that anyway). As Liam said it'd be good if you could check what's going on with these old dates. Thanks.