From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: mx31 snd and mc13783 codec status
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:03:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100407110350.GD3688@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100402104241.GC27613@sirena.org.uk>
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 11:42:42AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 11:53:58AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:01:38PM +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
>
> > > The thing is that I get a less than a second sound loop (I use aplay to
> > > test, so userspace app should be ok), as if the buffer that the fiq asm
> > > interrupt (from ssi_fiq.S) copies to the SSI hardware never was updated.
>
> > > If I have understood the fiq behaviour correctly, you have a asm fiq
> > > interrupt that does copy a larger tx buffer into the SSI hardware.
> > > Besides it, you have the imx_ssi_timer_callback that checks when the tx
> > > buffer was completely copied. If it is the case, then a new buffer tx
> > > buffer is "issued" with the snd_pcm_period_elapsed call (and then
> > > snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0). Is this behaviour correct ?
>
> > Yes.
>
> What sample rate are you trying to play and what buffer size? In my
> testing the FIQ was really struggling with most applications at sample
> rates over ~16kHz since you need each audio period to be long enough to
> at least fill the interval between timer polls but applications wanted
> to select buffer sizes that were consumed faster than the timer tick.
I just stumbled upon a board which had something in /etc/asound.conf
which decreased the buffer sizes. The result was choppy sound and a cpu
utilisation of ~40%.
After deleting the file I could play sounds (and record simultaniously)
with rates up to 44100kHz without visible cpu utilisation.
Looking at it I realised that poll_time is 0, so the timer gets reloaded
with the actual jiffies value which of course is a bad idea. We should
probably use a hrtimer here.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 16:23 mx31 snd and mc13783 codec status Valentin Longchamp
2010-03-30 20:40 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-31 8:38 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-03-31 8:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-04-01 16:01 ` Valentin Longchamp
2010-04-02 9:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2010-04-02 10:42 ` Mark Brown
2010-04-06 16:00 ` Valentin Longchamp
2010-04-07 11:03 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2010-04-07 12:12 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100407110350.GD3688@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).