From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pxa: add namespace on ssp Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:54:29 +0900 Message-ID: <20100417015428.GA25725@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20100409111609.GA13281@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1003103803 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 03:54:22 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Haojian Zhuang Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Eric Miao , linux-arm-kernel , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:54:08PM -0400, Haojian Zhuang wrote: > Excuse me for late response. Now patches are refreshed and they're > still based on Eric's ssp-cleanup branch. Since these patches are > relied on some ssp's fix. Do you want to immigrate these patches into > ASoC's tree? Would you pull eric's ssp-cleanup branch into ASoC tree? Pulling the SSP cleanup branch into both ASoC and PXA (or just ASoC) has been what I've been suggesting, but I'm not sure if Eric is comfortable with that idea? Please post patch serieses individually, not as one big set of attachments - it's much easier to apply using standard tools like git am.