From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tpa6130a2: Remove CPVSS supply Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:53:45 +0300 Message-ID: <20100519095345.a0fdcd52.jhnikula@gmail.com> References: <1274211085-20261-1-git-send-email-jhnikula@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0315A2452F for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2092143ewy.4 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 23:53:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: ilkka.koskinen@nokia.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, 19 May 2010 08:51:13 +0200 wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, 18 May 2010, Jarkko Nikila wrote: > >I believe there is no need for the CPVSS supply as this pin is for > >decoupling capacitor for the internal charge pump. > > Yes, you're right. I have a vague feeling that I put it there due to > some previous comments... > > Anyway, I believe tpa6140's HPVdd is similar case and, thus, not > needed either. Would you like to make a patch for that or shall I do > it? > I can do it and repost as it makes the patch even more simpler :-) -- Jarkko