From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] driver core: remove
	CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:14:00 -0700
Message-ID: <20100715041400.GA2583@suse.de>
References: <20100709185450.GA29473@kroah.com> <20100714163852.b3c09930.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <AANLkTinIy1z7226W0ylNfDdHXBp16Wt7aYBKQYY1o5t9@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinIy1z7226W0ylNfDdHXBp16Wt7aYBKQYY1o5t9@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@suse.de>, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:24:18AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:54:50 -0700
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> >> This is no longer needed by any userspace tools, so it's safe to
> >> remove.
> 
> Also still used for booting mainline kernels on RHEL5 userspaces.

Really?  I thought that was fixed a long time ago.  What kernel was
RHEL5 originally based on?

And note that no RHEL5 user is going to be using a .36 kernel on their
system, that's a completely unsupported and unadvised situation.  Heck,
I'd be amazed if a .34 kernel.org kernel boots on the thing, does it?

> Live with your mistakes guys, don't try and bury them.

I'm not, I honestly thought that we had resolved these issues.

So, which version of Centos matches up with RHEL5 so I can go download
it and see if I can resolve this?  We might just be able to reduce the
ammount of code we remove here and keep the Kconfig option around, if
that old userspace is expecting a portion of the symlinks to still be
present.

thanks,

greg k-h