From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] asoc: davinci: let platform data define edma queue numbers Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:50:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20100717185018.GC27456@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1279196059-6031-1-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D636103818 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:50:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1279196059-6031-1-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Sekhar Nori Cc: Kevin Hilman , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:44:19PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > This patch has been tested on DM644x and OMAP-L138 EVMs. > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori > This patch applies to latest of Linus's tree. ...so it doesn't apply against my for-2.6.36 branch (and obviously there's crossover with Kevin's tree as well which makes things possibly a bit interesting too). Could you please regenerate against for-2.6.36? You should generally always send patches against the latest version of code rather than Linus' tree, using other trees increases the chances that your patch will not apply.