From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Scheel Subject: Re: USB asynchronous mode feedback format Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:53:07 +0200 Message-ID: <201010171253.08023.julian@jusst.de> References: <1287046026.4cb6c38a2a179@discus.singnet.com.sg> <201010161830.31603.julian@jusst.de> <201010162052.03180.julian@jusst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp2.work.de (smtp.work.de [212.12.45.188]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B5C244BA for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:53:11 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <201010162052.03180.julian@jusst.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Clemens Ladisch , Alex Lee , Daniel Mack List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Am Samstag, 16. Oktober 2010, 20:52:02 schrieb Julian Scheel: > Anyway, as 3 byte feedback sending works, it might be worth to test the > 10.14 patch by Clemens to see if the feedback loop itself is working > properly then. Can you point me to that patch? Is it already commited to > current head? With the patch applied the feedback setting works perfectly fine! Now I just need to tweak my feedback loop to behave well. But generally asynchronous transmission works as expected now! Thanks a lot for the help! Will probably come back with some more questions (c: -Julian