alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC_ii/iv 3/3] ASoC: Extend DAPM to handle power changes on cross-device paths
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:43:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101101174305.GC24814@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101031201153.453f8294.jhnikula@gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:11:53PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:02:22PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:

> > > Functions dapm_seq_run and dapm_seq_run_coalesced are modified so that a new
> > > write is issued when the sequence extends to an another device and DAPM
> > > context of a widget instead of originating DAPM context is used when doing
> > > pop waits and register writes.

> > I'm having a hard time parsing this bit of the changelog, I'm afraid.
> > What I'd expect is that the comparison operation used for coalescing
> > would be extended to compare based on the CODEC/DAPM context too and the
> > split per device should naturally fall out of that.  I didn't notice the
> > comparison being updated?

> It was these diffs for dapm_seq_run:

> 		/* Do we need to apply any queued changes? */
> -		if (sort[w->id] != cur_sort || w->reg != cur_reg) {
> +		if (sort[w->id] != cur_sort || w->reg != cur_reg ||
> +		    w->dapm != cur_dapm) {
>  			if (!list_empty(&pending))
>  				dapm_seq_run_coalesced(dapm, &pending);

> So if DAPM is different the dapm_seq_run_coalesced is run now and next
> iterations are done for another DAPM context.

Pretty much - that was the code I was looking for but you were talking
about only the execution code, not the comparison operation.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-01 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-29 12:02 [RFC_ii/iv 1/3] ASoC: Move DAPM paths from DAPM context to snd_soc_card Jarkko Nikula
2010-10-29 12:02 ` [RFC_ii/iv 2/3] ASoC: Move widgets " Jarkko Nikula
2010-10-29 20:57   ` Mark Brown
2010-10-29 12:02 ` [RFC_ii/iv 3/3] ASoC: Extend DAPM to handle power changes on cross-device paths Jarkko Nikula
2010-10-29 21:03   ` Mark Brown
2010-10-31 18:11     ` Jarkko Nikula
2010-11-01 17:43       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-10-29 20:51 ` [RFC_ii/iv 1/3] ASoC: Move DAPM paths from DAPM context to snd_soc_card Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101101174305.GC24814@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=jhnikula@gmail.com \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).