From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: WM8580: Debug interface index Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:39:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20101203163932.GX859@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1291340065-16897-1-git-send-email-jassi.brar@samsung.com> <1291376076.3271.32.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A744A10384A for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:39:34 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1291376076.3271.32.camel@odin> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, Jassi Brar List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:36AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:34 +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: > > We want the index of DAI's driver here. > It's fine but could you add a little more context here. Yes, please. Indeed, the DAI ID should be being initialised from the driver ID by the core so it's a bit surprising if they diverge - why do we want the driver index? Though I've gone ahead and applied anyway as at worst it's a noop.