From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@ti.com>,
ext Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Fix race condition in widgets power list creation
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:34:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101181434.13937.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3582D3.40105@nokia.com>
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 14:08:51 ext Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Resend, since alsa-devel address was mistyped ;)
>
> On 01/18/11 13:39, ext Mark Brown wrote:
> > > I *suspect* that we're in a similar case and either the locking has
> > > been broken by the multi-component stuff or there's other cases that
> > > need protection, probably the jack detection code.
>
> The snd_soc_dapm_sync is just a wrapper for dapm_power_widgets, right?
> It (snd_soc_dapm_sync) is used in soc-core:soc_post_component_init.
> But there is no need for it, since the snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets will
> call dapm_power_widgets at the end. so we can remove the
> snd_soc_dapm_sync from there.
> For the rest:
> I would replace the snd_soc_dapm_sync calls in soc-dapm.c with
> dapm_power_widgets(dapm, SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_NOP); calls.
> Modify the snd_soc_dapm_sync to use the codec->mutex around the
> dapm_power_widgets call.
> In that way I think all race conditions going to be covered without
> adding new mutex.
>
> What do you think?
> I can make a patch...
Or not.. soc-jack.c:snd_soc_jack_report also calls snd_soc_dapm_sync, while
keeping the codec->mutex locked...
Should machine drivers also take the mutex when they call snd_soc_dapm_sync?
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1295318127-17968-1-git-send-email-misael.lopez@ti.com>
2011-01-18 10:39 ` [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Fix race condition in widgets power list creation Mark Brown
[not found] ` <4D357B09.70505@nokia.com>
2011-01-18 11:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-18 12:08 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2011-01-18 12:26 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-18 12:47 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2011-01-18 13:21 ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-01-18 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-18 12:34 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2011-01-18 13:22 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-18 2:36 Misael Lopez Cruz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101181434.13937.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=misael.lopez@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).