From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: tegra: Platform data fixes for ASoC driver updates Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:11:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20110121181103.GA22414@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1295393859-3396-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1295556731-25165-4-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <20110120212259.GA21324@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF0310AD4251@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20110121175034.GC6200@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF0310AD4252@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471D41037EA for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:11:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF0310AD4252@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "Erik Gilling (konkers@google.com)" , "Colin Cross (ccross@google.com)" , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:06:33AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > Mark Brown wrote on Friday, January 21, 2011 10:50: > > Oh, I see. I hadn't realised there wer eother dependencies, please > > ensure you mention any such dependencies in the changlogs so we avoid > > introducing breakage. > That was the intent of what I wrote in the "cover letter" "patch". It doesn't refer to anything outside the series itself and the current state of the relevant trees, which seemed to be what you were saying... It'd also be helpful if you could stop burying patches in old threads - it makes it hard to find the most recent stuff. > To be explicit, the only dependency is that the patch quoted above, which > adds some platform data types, needs to be checked in to te ASoC tree > rather than the usual ARM tree, before the following ASoC patch is > applied: ...but possibly not?