From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ASoC: sh: fsi: sound format selection Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:44:39 +0900 Message-ID: <20110125144438.GA19428@linux-sh.org> References: <20110125141144.GF31453@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from master.linux-sh.org (124x34x33x190.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [124.34.33.190]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03AA103971 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:44:50 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110125141144.GF31453@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Linux-ALSA , Kuninori Morimoto , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:11:44PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:41:22AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > > But I'm not sure it is OK for SPDIF. > > So, I set these patches as [RFC] > > This looks OK for me providing it tests OK - if everyone else is OK with > it we can just apply? The architecture bits are largely trivial, so no problem there: Acked-by: Paul Mundt