From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDB93xx: Add support for CS4271 CODEC on EDB93xx boards Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:54:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20110202075434.GA2445@acer> References: <1296603653.1504.9.camel@r60e> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f179.google.com (mail-ey0-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDE41037FB for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:56:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by eyg24 with SMTP id 24so3458343eyg.38 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:56:20 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1296603653.1504.9.camel@r60e> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Alexander Sverdlin Cc: Dimitris Papastamos , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown , H Hartley Sweeten , Lennert Buytenhek , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:40:53AM +0300, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > From: Alexander Sverdlin > > Add support for CS4271 SPI-connected CODEC on EDB93xx boards. > Major rework based on code provided by H Hartley Sweeten . > Tested on EDB9302, others (EDB9301, EDB9302A, EDB9307A, EDB0315A) should work. One minor comment, see below. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin > --- > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c > index 4b04316..f20be96 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c > @@ -30,12 +30,22 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > +#include > > #include > > #include > #include > > +#include > + > +#define edb93xx_has_audio() (machine_is_edb9301() || \ > + machine_is_edb9302() || \ > + machine_is_edb9302a() || \ > + machine_is_edb9307a() || \ > + machine_is_edb9315a()) > > static void __init edb93xx_register_flash(void) > { > @@ -93,6 +103,111 @@ static void __init edb93xx_register_i2c(void) > > > /************************************************************************* > + * EDB93xx SPI peripheral handling > + *************************************************************************/ > +static int edb93xx_cs4271_hw_setup(struct spi_device *spi) > +{ > + int gpio_nreset; > + int err; > + > + if (machine_is_edb9301() || machine_is_edb9302()) { > + gpio_nreset = EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_EGPIO1; > + } else if (machine_is_edb9302a() || machine_is_edb9307a()) { > + ep93xx_devcfg_set_bits(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVCFG_HONIDE); > + gpio_nreset = EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_DD2; > + } else if (machine_is_edb9315a()) { > + gpio_nreset = EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_EGPIO14; > + } else { > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + err = gpio_request(gpio_nreset, spi->modalias); > + if (err) > + return err; > + err = gpio_request(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_EGPIO6, spi->modalias); > + if (err) Should you call gpio_free() for gpio_nreset here? Regards, MW > + return err; > + > + gpio_direction_output(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_EGPIO6, 1); > + > + /* Reset codec */ > + gpio_direction_output(gpio_nreset, 0); > + udelay(1); > + gpio_set_value(gpio_nreset, 1); > + /* Give the codec time to wake up */ > + udelay(1); > + > + return 0; > +}