From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDB93xx: Add support for CS4271 CODEC on
	EDB93xx boards
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:49:43 +0000
Message-ID: <20110202104943.GN12743@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1296603653.1504.9.camel@r60e>
	<0D753D10438DA54287A00B027084269764CEF59B2B@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
	<1296643688.1504.23.camel@r60e>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
	[80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22836103992
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed,  2 Feb 2011 11:49:45 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1296643688.1504.23.camel@r60e>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Alexander Sverdlin <subaparts@yandex.ru>
Cc: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 01:48:08PM +0300, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:

> I'm really confused now, where should it be? If I will init
> cs4271_platform_data with GPIO values, CODEC driver will manage it.
> Otherwise CODEC driver should be rewritten without GPIO support and I
> can add it to platform code.

What is the problem?