From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Question about your DSP topic branch Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 06:42:40 +0900 Message-ID: <20110331214239.GB21726@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <4D2652C8.7030701@codeaurora.org> <4D939519.6040506@codeaurora.org> <4D9421DB.4010204@codeaurora.org> <1301607322.3549.211.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBA410381E for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1301607322.3549.211.camel@odin> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: Patrick Lai , alsa-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:35:22PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > It should be possible to add support for the _E() macros in soc-dsp.c, > but I'm not sure why it's required atm since we dont need this for OMAP4 > ABE. Not sure why Patrick might need it but some of the DSPs I've seen require a multiple write sequence to kick them into doing things - for example, set the state up then do another write to tell it to apply the new configuration.