From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: WM8903 DMIC, and stereo mux vs. 2 mono muxes Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:37:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20110418133756.GA2466@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1303014585-32331-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ED21037F2 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:38:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1303014585-32331-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:29:45PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > So, is there a way to correctly represent this while only exposing a > single control for it? No, not at present. DAPM only deals in mono controls. Your current patch looks good though... > +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new dsp_mux = > + SOC_DAPM_ENUM("DSP Mux", dsp_enum); > + ...this should be more descriptively named - Decimator input or something.