From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Fix SPI driver binding for WM8987 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:31:37 +0900 Message-ID: <20110809153136.GH15861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1312362661-4544-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E41253E.2040407@ti.com> <20110809150503.GE15861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E415204.8020702@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251CA24478 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E415204.8020702@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:28:04PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On 09/08/11 16:05, Mark Brown wrote: > > Hrm? Subject line says WM8987... > But the diff said WM8750 iirc. The issue being fixed is that the two devices are register compatible but for SPI we were only registering a device ID for wm8750, for I2C we'd got both IDs registered. The driver says wm8750 everywhere except the device IDs.