From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: ep93xx: convert to use snd_soc_register_card() Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:59:21 +0300 Message-ID: <20110912155921.GA2657@mwesterb-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <4E6D4100.7060007@gmail.com> <20110912101939.GA2953@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com (mail-bw0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE80103807 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:59:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so1737941bkb.38 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110912101939.GA2953@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: hsweeten@visionengravers.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "Girdwood, Liam" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ryan Mallon List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:19:39AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:55:49AM +0100, Girdwood, Liam wrote: > > > ASoC parts > > > Acked-by: Liam Girdwood > > I'm happy with them too - they should probably all go in together, > do folks want me to apply them to ASoC or should we merge via the ARM > tree? I'm kind of hoping that Hartley would (N)ACK the mach-ep93xx parts so that they could be merged via ASoC tree.