From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] ASoC: twl6040: One workqueue should be enough Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:41:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20110926144114.GM2946@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1317043593-27202-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1317043593-27202-6-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A45A24507 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:41:16 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1317043593-27202-6-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Misael Lopez Cruz List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:26:28PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > It is a bit overkill to have three (3) separate > workqueue for a single driver. > We can manage things with one workqueue nicely. Do we even need specific workqueues at all or can we use the system workqueue? Looks OK though.