From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd_wm8994 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:08:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20111003140824.GM3731@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1317587284-2776-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1869072.QQLATNzYYx@wuerfel> <20111003120741.GD23811@sirena.org.uk> <11174515.ANsqIhx0NX@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79542437D for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11174515.ANsqIhx0NX@wuerfel> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Sangbeom Kim , 'Jassi Brar' , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Liam Girdwood' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > You've not sent a seprate patch for that one yet... > I wasn't sure any more which version you wanted. Is this this right one? I was expecting something that selects the core. I was also expecting something that can be applied against -next which this patch can't be, this doesn't feel like something we should be rushing into 3.1.