From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ASoC: soc-pcm: Add flag to ignore pmdown_time at pcm_close Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:00:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20111013140003.GM1098@sirena.org.uk> References: <1318512215-2331-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1318512215-2331-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08019247B4 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:00:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318512215-2331-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Misael Lopez Cruz List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:23:34PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > With this flag machine drivers can indicate that it is desired > to ignore the pmdown_time for DAPM shutdown sequence when > playback stream is stopped. > The DAPM sequence will be executed without delay in this case. Why make this a per-machine control? This seems like it'd be a property of the CODEC or possibly other chips rather than a machine specific thing?