From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ASoC: soc-pcm: Add flag to ignore pmdown_time at pcm_close Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:38:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20111014093840.GA5448@sirena.org.uk> References: <1318512215-2331-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1318512215-2331-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20111013140003.GM1098@sirena.org.uk> <10992537.0jJ7E3VM1G@barack> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.sirena.org.uk [80.68.93.111]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB43243E2 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:38:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10992537.0jJ7E3VM1G@barack> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: P?ter Ujfalusi Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Misael Lopez Cruz List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:24:01PM +0300, P?ter Ujfalusi wrote: > I thought that depending on the environment we might need this or not for the > same component, and the best place for this is to be able to define it per dai > link. > However I can move the flag as per codec configuration (within snd_soc_codec > struct). Would that be better? I'd expect that it's likely to follow the device a lot of the time - for example, in the case that motivated this it seems that every system using twl6040 is going to need to work around the DC servo issue.