From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: core: Add flag to ignore
 pmdown_time at pcm_close
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:45:53 +0100
Message-ID: <20111022094552.GA3382@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1318592614-13110-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
	<1318592614-13110-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
	<12D0C12AF19E15409D57F22566E88EF50A813690AD@bgsmsx501.gar.corp.intel.com>
	<20111021085303.GB3513@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<12D0C12AF19E15409D57F22566E88EF50A81369249@bgsmsx501.gar.corp.intel.com>
	<20111021091358.GG3513@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<12D0C12AF19E15409D57F22566E88EF50A813D504E@bgsmsx501.gar.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
	[80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86592447A
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>;
	Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:45:55 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <12D0C12AF19E15409D57F22566E88EF50A813D504E@bgsmsx501.gar.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: "Babu, Ramesh" <ramesh.babu@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>, "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>, Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@ti.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:28:44PM +0530, Babu, Ramesh wrote:

> If it is a board specific requirement, then would it make sense to have it in
> dai_link as per Peter Ujfaulsi's RFC [1].

Possibly for your case - the case this was originally written for was
rather different, the CODEC has issues which mean it always needs to
skip the delay so having to specify this for every single board is going
to be repetitive.

> In general, how this kind of situation is handled?

Usually by keeping the clocks available.