From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] ASoC: fsi: Add DMAEngine support Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 17:12:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20120204171240.GE8042@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <871uqcjo9i.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87aa50i971.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20120203134850.GM3151@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4F2BE998.4020903@metafoo.de> <20120203141440.GR3151@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1328373092.26182.27.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0888239028102592823==" Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61915243AB for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:12:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1328373092.26182.27.camel@vkoul-udesk3> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: Linux-ALSA , Lars-Peter Clausen , Kuninori Morimoto , Sascha Hauer , Wolfram Sang , Ralf Baechle , H Hartley Sweeten , Kuninori Morimoto , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============0888239028102592823== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3O1VwFp74L81IIeR" Content-Disposition: inline --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:01:32PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 14:14 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > That doesn't sound insurmountible - you need a callback to allow the > > individual drivers to set the parameters but hopefully the data flow is > > more generic? There will probably be some other setup type stuff that > > needs doing. > I had though about this sometime back, and if we add dmaengine support > into asoc, we wouldn't need to add this kind of support in every driver. OK, this all sounds good and it seems like Lars-Peter has already been working on this. It doesn't seem like it's worth holding Morimoto-san's patch up for the infrastructure, though so once we work out what's going on with the bugfix patch I'll go ahead with that and we can convert it over to use the framework later. --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPLWcAAAoJEBus8iNuMP3dvWoP/iBGG5ff7IDyChwqiOAg5Eof gElMb2Z8Cj+HIHQAsd1x67iVM6dCGO6RA63ihGUG/ip81+u9ITC6zv6yxyOIbP5G y38DZZnekHDz5thg3PNSL+3W93glPMGTa/TdflaWFG0L8H1dEOwP9v8nuC6sN9PJ hm2+hTyUbtmb4kNKAOXz/J2MY1Rs3H892DHVE3VXU5m0pEtdUmJRBnJxmrnuqmSw Q7a8T7GfRXxB6UPBUSyqAF/Dc2XvdN+1iXZF2c2jRwPl0vD7FggdL03EuByt+85O TwfCpBc75X0ObFzXJ+vm0E/2GsN7NgzxKFwbzs+/lDKJrMIp4xU2GJd7eLVfyYPL 16tPYYG41J05pGb87TpQrbfrhy6rjKTx6mTgDiotifUymGEfAGV2IrxJQ1tWxNRJ aNRVkS6CsorT1xat4l9xGs11HAtFZ4CGJxswoJeDzDbaz2MPajpMzZbYvSoTuT98 Woj/JFMz6kneoBjRJmi4UwnX9QC4i6yMg8kcvPNkeLS4L6WQiBxoiMSZMb/mxe6P j8GHPFBmnSNQlqZ4W3S/WtU0vmuOGNcrSTS1Jw3OuhWQw/0v2UKf0rfbIuHqS/ix y3YlTpsJc5fOxK7qnfDCzEkvPP6+GBsugabDYI/jJovbs7mvqoASY7+dD8SqSQjl 79aMoJKLRR3sZe+AHI4d =2cQ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR-- --===============0888239028102592823== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============0888239028102592823==--