From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:25:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20120729202510.GB4384@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343392734-11805-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343392734-11805-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C870265218 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:25:09 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1343392734-11805-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Lee Jones Cc: ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, lrg@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sameo@linux.intel.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > If a list of widgets is provided and one of them fails to be added as > a control, the present semantics fail all subsequent widgets. A better > solution would be to only fail that widget, but pursue in attempting > to add the rest of the list. You've completely ignored my question about why this is better. This is also *clearly* not an urgent bugfix.