From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] ARM: ux500: Add ux500 PCM to DB8500 Device Tree Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:40:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20120730134054.GC4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343393162-11938-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343393162-11938-14-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120729205001.GK4384@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5016389B.4020003@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775962652F6 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5016389B.4020003@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Lee Jones Cc: ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, lrg@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 29/07/12 21:50, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >>+ pcm: ux500-pcm { > >>+ compatible = "stericsson,ux500-pcm"; > >>+ }; > >>+ > >One of two things is wrong here. Either you've not provided any > >information about the hardware so the driver won't be able to work out > >what to talk to or you've not provided any data so you're registering a > >purely virtual Linux-internal device via the device tree. > >Once more, the idea here is to describe the hardware not to dump Linux's > >internal data structures into the device tree. > We use it register the driver for probe()ing. In the same way we do > for the PMU and Regulators. All three of which actually belong to a > different hardware block. Do you know of a better way to register > those devices? You've not identified which of the two cases above we're in... assuming it's a virtal device look at how the DT bindings for the other platforms are doing things.