From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:42:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20120731134214.GK4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343741493-17671-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343741493-17671-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1343741493-17671-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@ti.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:31:23PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > If a list of widgets is provided and one of them fails to be added as > a control, the present semantics fail all subsequent widgets. A better > solution would be to only fail that widget, but pursue in attempting > to add the rest of the list. You're posting this *again* without bothering to respond to my review comments.