* Re: Should codec suspend when no paths are marked to be active across a suspend action? [not found] <CAFM_0b8xAuth0DGzNTMRpBy1VZ5vUJKPNEo2gRO+5Z7G+2CAUQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-09-06 23:56 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2012-09-06 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Taylor Hutt; +Cc: alsa-devel, Dylan Reid On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:55:00PM -0700, Taylor Hutt wrote: > Shouldn't the codec be suspended if there are no paths set to remain > active across the suspend? Yes. If you're using an analogue bypass path there's a very recent commit in -next from me which should help, previously we weren't ever really suspending bypass paths at all (even before the changes to keep some paths active) though we might end up doing so by accident. Nobody noticed since essentially nobody uses analogue bypass any more. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-09-06 23:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAFM_0b8xAuth0DGzNTMRpBy1VZ5vUJKPNEo2gRO+5Z7G+2CAUQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-06 23:56 ` Should codec suspend when no paths are marked to be active across a suspend action? Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).