From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: ASoC: dapm: Allow regulators to bypass as well as disable when idle Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:42:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20120928104233.GA30869@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20120927195758.GA10652@elgon.mountain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028CC2615CE for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:42:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120927195758.GA10652@elgon.mountain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Dan Carpenter Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:57:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Right now ->invert is a single bit bitfield. We mostly test > "if (w->invert) {...". Are we planning to add some more bits in there? There aren't any plans at present, but it's possible we might add some. When we do the definition of invert will have to change as you point out.