From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: issue of shdma-base library Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20121005122154.GA4360@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <506A7E48.3060701@jinso.co.jp> <506CEEA8.7020003@jinso.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9D72616A2 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:21:56 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Shimoda Yoshihiro , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Morimoto Kuninori , "Do Q.Thang" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Mark, could you take this patch or would you like me to resend it with > "subject" in the actual mail subject line or does it also work from the > mail body? Don't top post! I'll get to it some time, though the fact that the subject line doesn't look like a patch let alone a patch for a subsystem I maintain means that it's not going to be found when I go looking for unrevewied patches.